It's May 23, 2024, 07:29:05 AM
na, but fareal ---exclude the legend/o.g.-status thing for a sec, n look at it from an objective standpoint --- Eazy was never talented as an artist or writer, but his son is
I'm not a Eazy E fan or think he was as great as some posters here think but this thread is coming from the same poster who said Mack 10 doesn't have a SINGLE dope solo song 90% of the posts on Dubcc have been for shock value purposes only for a while ....
his son will never reach the status of his father.... so who's more talented?
what do u mean?like a scale?like Eazy is 25percent talented, and 2pac is 50percent talented?i dont understand
I don't know if Lil Eazy was more talented than his father. They both never had much replay value to me.The song Lil Eazy did with Bone shits on Eazy-E's entire discography though.http://www.youtube.com/v/LEoacmm9rE0
relax, Williami know what u mean.the argument wasn't his skills as a live-performer, however----> "rapper"a less talented hiphop-artist (rapper, lyricsit, song-writer) can be a talented performer - hes just performin his songs, Lil Jon is a great performer. very energetic
the argument wasn't his skills as a live-performer, however----> "rapper"a less talented hiphop-artist (rapper, lyricsit, song-writer) can be a talented performer - hes just performin his songs, Lil Jon is a great performer. very energetic
Quote from: Michael Madsen on November 21, 2011, 03:22:57 AMthe argument wasn't his skills as a live-performer, however----> "rapper"a less talented hiphop-artist (rapper, lyricsit, song-writer) can be a talented performer - hes just performin his songs, Lil Jon is a great performer. very energetic performing is also a sizeable part of being a hip-hop artist. rocking crowds is one of the most important elements of hip-hop. so being a talented performer is part of being a talented rapper and should be taken into account as much as, say, being a talented lyricist. I wouldn't dare say that Eazy-E was a great rapper, hell as Classic Material pointed out he only did it to fill a void but in the end he got the job done and his music sure wasn't worthless. so Lil Eazy E may be a better rapper than his father but does it make Lil Eazy E's music better and more relevant than that of E's ? I don't know.
Quote from: bouli77 on November 21, 2011, 04:23:42 AMQuote from: Michael Madsen on November 21, 2011, 03:22:57 AMthe argument wasn't his skills as a live-performer, however----> "rapper"a less talented hiphop-artist (rapper, lyricsit, song-writer) can be a talented performer - hes just performin his songs, Lil Jon is a great performer. very energetic performing is also a sizeable part of being a hip-hop artist. rocking crowds is one of the most important elements of hip-hop. so being a talented performer is part of being a talented rapper and should be taken into account as much as, say, being a talented lyricist. I wouldn't dare say that Eazy-E was a great rapper, hell as Classic Material pointed out he only did it to fill a void but in the end he got the job done and his music sure wasn't worthless. so Lil Eazy E may be a better rapper than his father but does it make Lil Eazy E's music better and more relevant than that of E's ? I don't know.no it doesnt, performing is just charisma/presence, nothin to do wit talentperforming is delivering ur bars to music on stage, or lipsyncing to ur music. dont gimme that "Master of the crowd/ceremonies" crap. MF Doom and Kool G Rap are some of the most skilled lyricists/rappers ever, and they couldnt rock shows even if they life depended on it