It's May 02, 2024, 06:47:55 AM
Quote from: SMiLE on June 18, 2004, 04:54:11 PMPulp Fiction is a good movie. dont know were this came from, but, it sure is, my fav movie of all time... dialoge is just too good
Pulp Fiction is a good movie.
The music isn't my cup of tea but the guy seems cool as hell. Like an old dude you could just chill with and you could learn off of.
I never said Bruce was the greatest or best, I said he was my favourite and that he's better than Michael Jackson (and what I meant was more versatile). I apologize for the confusion.But since you put Pet Sounds over the albums I mentioned, why don't you explain to me what makes Pet Sounds so great? I mean I like it, but you called it the greatest like it's a fact. So tell me what makes it better or even as good as "The Wall", or "Who's Next".You say I have the problem of not being able to distinguish between preference and quality, but I think it's more you that have that problem. You talk about Wilson's musical ability and significance like the guy's fuckin Mozart or Beethoven. News flash!!!!!! He's not even close. I understand that Pet Sounds was the first album to have a reaccuring theme. But c'mon that's all it really had going for it. Some say it had a surprising amount of soul, but those people meant it had a surprising amount of soul for a Beach Boys album, or for a bunch of white guys, not for the sake of soul. If you look at the black artists of the day soul was oozing out of there records way more than the Beach Boys' ones. Now I don't want to seem like I'm putting down Pet Sounds, because I love the album. I own the album. And I frequently listen to the album. But I have a problem with someone calling it the absolute greatest, and then disgracing classic albums by Dylan, the Who, and Floyd. In the end there is no such thing as the greatest album, it's all subjective. I'ts all preference. There is no factual quality in art. It's not like saying one chair is better in quality than the other, because the chair could physically be built better and last longer. An album or a song is based on preference and emotion (and marketing), if people like it they like it. It doesn't make it good or better than another, because that is impossible.If industry insiders, reviewers and journalists deem it a masterpeice that doesn't make it one. (and for the record if you were to poll those people Springsteen would beat Jackson by a landslide, sorry had to get that in there). You can sit there on your high horse and pretend you know more about music than every other living person. You can feel special because you're the only guy you know your age that listens to and respects the music you do. But the reality is you know nothing, I know nothing. We're just a couple of idiots with very strong opinions about topics that are 100 percent irrelevent to the world. You like what you like and I like what I like. Don't ever be foolish enough to think that your opinion is stronger than mine, or vice versa.
I'm wrong. I'm off to buy my Boss CD's now; now THERE'S a GENIUS.
Quote from: SMiLE on June 26, 2004, 08:56:10 PMI'm wrong. I'm off to buy my Boss CD's now; now THERE'S a GENIUS. I never once said Bruce was a genius, so there is no need for your sarcastic remarks. Do I like Bruce better than Wilson? Yes. Would I say he is better than Wilson? No. Even if I were to compare the two, Brian Wilson will go down in history as a better artist than Springsteen. There is no denying that.However sarcasm aside, you'd be doing yourself a great service by picking up some of his albums. Darkness on the Edge of Town is probably his best one. I plan on getting the new Wilson CD. Be honest, how much Springsteen are you familiar with? Do you own any of his albums?