It's May 21, 2024, 06:22:41 AM
LOL 2 games vs the worst team in NFL history, played the bills without marshawn lynch, the skins without sean taylor (PLUS 2 starters on hte skins defense went down in the 1st drive vs the pats), the eagles without Mcnabb, the Giants without Shockey, the Colts without Harrisonvery easy schedule compared to the Colts having to play those solid AFC south teams twice each
Quote from: Hack Wilson on January 01, 2008, 12:59:54 PMLOL 2 games vs the worst team in NFL history, played the bills without marshawn lynch, the skins without sean taylor (PLUS 2 starters on hte skins defense went down in the 1st drive vs the pats), the eagles without Mcnabb, the Giants without Shockey, the Colts without Harrisonvery easy schedule compared to the Colts having to play those solid AFC south teams twice eachlol...the Pats are the only team in the league that played teams with players that were injured.The Pats played a lot of the better teams (IND, DAL, PIT, SD, WAS, CLE, NYG) in the league and beat them all, you can't take anything away them no matter how much you try to justify it.
Quote from: Hack Wilson on January 01, 2008, 12:59:54 PMQuote from: So Glorious on December 30, 2007, 09:57:09 AMOur schedule wasn't as weak as you think. 16 and 0 baby.LOL 2 games vs the worst team in NFL history, played the bills without marshawn lynch, the skins without sean taylor (PLUS 2 starters on hte skins defense went down in the 1st drive vs the pats), the eagles without Mcnabb, the Giants without Shockey, the Colts without Harrisonvery easy schedule compared to the Colts having to play those solid AFC south teams twice eachwho cares...the Pats beat the Colts at INDY, whats ur excuse for that?
Quote from: So Glorious on December 30, 2007, 09:57:09 AMOur schedule wasn't as weak as you think. 16 and 0 baby.LOL 2 games vs the worst team in NFL history, played the bills without marshawn lynch, the skins without sean taylor (PLUS 2 starters on hte skins defense went down in the 1st drive vs the pats), the eagles without Mcnabb, the Giants without Shockey, the Colts without Harrisonvery easy schedule compared to the Colts having to play those solid AFC south teams twice each
Our schedule wasn't as weak as you think. 16 and 0 baby.
Quote from: "THE" MoSav on January 01, 2008, 01:21:53 PMQuote from: Hack Wilson on January 01, 2008, 12:59:54 PMQuote from: So Glorious on December 30, 2007, 09:57:09 AMOur schedule wasn't as weak as you think. 16 and 0 baby.LOL 2 games vs the worst team in NFL history, played the bills without marshawn lynch, the skins without sean taylor (PLUS 2 starters on hte skins defense went down in the 1st drive vs the pats), the eagles without Mcnabb, the Giants without Shockey, the Colts without Harrisonvery easy schedule compared to the Colts having to play those solid AFC south teams twice eachwho cares...the Pats beat the Colts at INDY, whats ur excuse for that?It wasn't just Harrison. Ugoh's replacement in that game played horribly. Every time they got a break to Manning, including the last fumble it was by going right through Charlie Johnson. Harrison may have gotten them that 4 extra points and given Wayne and Clark more room to get open on thrird downs but put Ugoh back in too and Cots win that game. The Pats might win the AFC final against the Colts (if both teams make it) but if Moss and Matt Light were out then NE has no chance.
Quote from: "THE" MoSav on January 01, 2008, 01:25:51 PMQuote from: Hack Wilson on January 01, 2008, 01:25:07 PMQuote from: "THE" MoSav on January 01, 2008, 01:21:53 PMQuote from: Hack Wilson on January 01, 2008, 12:59:54 PMQuote from: So Glorious on December 30, 2007, 09:57:09 AMOur schedule wasn't as weak as you think. 16 and 0 baby.LOL 2 games vs the worst team in NFL history, played the bills without marshawn lynch, the skins without sean taylor (PLUS 2 starters on hte skins defense went down in the 1st drive vs the pats), the eagles without Mcnabb, the Giants without Shockey, the Colts without Harrisonvery easy schedule compared to the Colts having to play those solid AFC south teams twice eachwho cares...the Pats beat the Colts at INDY, whats ur excuse for that?marvin harrison, already used it. i give them credit for winning every game, but unless they go 19-0 it doesn't matter.and what about at Dallas?dallas is just an over-rated immature team thats not making the superbowl this year
Quote from: Hack Wilson on January 01, 2008, 01:25:07 PMQuote from: "THE" MoSav on January 01, 2008, 01:21:53 PMQuote from: Hack Wilson on January 01, 2008, 12:59:54 PMQuote from: So Glorious on December 30, 2007, 09:57:09 AMOur schedule wasn't as weak as you think. 16 and 0 baby.LOL 2 games vs the worst team in NFL history, played the bills without marshawn lynch, the skins without sean taylor (PLUS 2 starters on hte skins defense went down in the 1st drive vs the pats), the eagles without Mcnabb, the Giants without Shockey, the Colts without Harrisonvery easy schedule compared to the Colts having to play those solid AFC south teams twice eachwho cares...the Pats beat the Colts at INDY, whats ur excuse for that?marvin harrison, already used it. i give them credit for winning every game, but unless they go 19-0 it doesn't matter.and what about at Dallas?
Quote from: "THE" MoSav on January 01, 2008, 01:21:53 PMQuote from: Hack Wilson on January 01, 2008, 12:59:54 PMQuote from: So Glorious on December 30, 2007, 09:57:09 AMOur schedule wasn't as weak as you think. 16 and 0 baby.LOL 2 games vs the worst team in NFL history, played the bills without marshawn lynch, the skins without sean taylor (PLUS 2 starters on hte skins defense went down in the 1st drive vs the pats), the eagles without Mcnabb, the Giants without Shockey, the Colts without Harrisonvery easy schedule compared to the Colts having to play those solid AFC south teams twice eachwho cares...the Pats beat the Colts at INDY, whats ur excuse for that?marvin harrison, already used it. i give them credit for winning every game, but unless they go 19-0 it doesn't matter.
Quote from: Shallow on January 02, 2008, 08:28:51 AMQuote from: "THE" MoSav on January 01, 2008, 01:21:53 PMQuote from: Hack Wilson on January 01, 2008, 12:59:54 PMQuote from: So Glorious on December 30, 2007, 09:57:09 AMOur schedule wasn't as weak as you think. 16 and 0 baby.LOL 2 games vs the worst team in NFL history, played the bills without marshawn lynch, the skins without sean taylor (PLUS 2 starters on hte skins defense went down in the 1st drive vs the pats), the eagles without Mcnabb, the Giants without Shockey, the Colts without Harrisonvery easy schedule compared to the Colts having to play those solid AFC south teams twice eachwho cares...the Pats beat the Colts at INDY, whats ur excuse for that?It wasn't just Harrison. Ugoh's replacement in that game played horribly. Every time they got a break to Manning, including the last fumble it was by going right through Charlie Johnson. Harrison may have gotten them that 4 extra points and given Wayne and Clark more room to get open on thrird downs but put Ugoh back in too and Cots win that game. The Pats might win the AFC final against the Colts (if both teams make it) but if Moss and Matt Light were out then NE has no chance.NO SHIT, IF THIS AND IF THATif Brady had better WR's then Gaffney and Caldwell (WHO DROPPED A PASS IN THE END ZONE, which made the pats settle for a fg, 4 pt difference, the difference in the game) then Peyton wouldnt even have a title...STOP MAKING EXCUSES
Quote from: "THE" MoSav on January 02, 2008, 01:16:41 PMQuote from: Shallow on January 02, 2008, 08:28:51 AMQuote from: "THE" MoSav on January 01, 2008, 01:21:53 PMQuote from: Hack Wilson on January 01, 2008, 12:59:54 PMQuote from: So Glorious on December 30, 2007, 09:57:09 AMOur schedule wasn't as weak as you think. 16 and 0 baby.LOL 2 games vs the worst team in NFL history, played the bills without marshawn lynch, the skins without sean taylor (PLUS 2 starters on hte skins defense went down in the 1st drive vs the pats), the eagles without Mcnabb, the Giants without Shockey, the Colts without Harrisonvery easy schedule compared to the Colts having to play those solid AFC south teams twice eachwho cares...the Pats beat the Colts at INDY, whats ur excuse for that?It wasn't just Harrison. Ugoh's replacement in that game played horribly. Every time they got a break to Manning, including the last fumble it was by going right through Charlie Johnson. Harrison may have gotten them that 4 extra points and given Wayne and Clark more room to get open on thrird downs but put Ugoh back in too and Cots win that game. The Pats might win the AFC final against the Colts (if both teams make it) but if Moss and Matt Light were out then NE has no chance.NO SHIT, IF THIS AND IF THATif Brady had better WR's then Gaffney and Caldwell (WHO DROPPED A PASS IN THE END ZONE, which made the pats settle for a fg, 4 pt difference, the difference in the game) then Peyton wouldnt even have a title...STOP MAKING EXCUSESI'm not makng excuses. I'm just saying I wouldn't be surprised if a healthy Colts really lay a beating on NE. I can't see them letting up those two big plays again in the next game and with Ugoh, Diem, and Harrison all healthy the offense could put up a lot more points than last time. All depending on the weather of course. But even then the new Addai and Keith speed and power combo looks even better than last years Rhodes/Addai paring. Addai is a lot better this, and Keith can stretch a play like Rhodes.And hate on Caldwell and the rest all you want. Moss dropped a few balls this year too, and if not for about 18 push offs he may have not gotten a lot of TDs (why no one pounded him for all those psh offs is beyond me) Gonzalez dropped as pass in this season's game. I'm not blaming him for the loss. The Pats could have won if they ran the ball a bit more. Take away Dillon's one big run and they only ran for 60 yards all game. The Colts pounded out about 130 yards in that game. If the whole thing was reversed and Indy had to go fown field in the last minute and Manning threw an INT to finish the game no one would shut up about Manning "choking again". Both teams played sloppy all game. The team who played more sloppy at the end lost.
Quote from: Shallow on January 02, 2008, 06:56:39 PMQuote from: "THE" MoSav on January 02, 2008, 01:16:41 PMQuote from: Shallow on January 02, 2008, 08:28:51 AMQuote from: "THE" MoSav on January 01, 2008, 01:21:53 PMQuote from: Hack Wilson on January 01, 2008, 12:59:54 PMQuote from: So Glorious on December 30, 2007, 09:57:09 AMOur schedule wasn't as weak as you think. 16 and 0 baby.LOL 2 games vs the worst team in NFL history, played the bills without marshawn lynch, the skins without sean taylor (PLUS 2 starters on hte skins defense went down in the 1st drive vs the pats), the eagles without Mcnabb, the Giants without Shockey, the Colts without Harrisonvery easy schedule compared to the Colts having to play those solid AFC south teams twice eachwho cares...the Pats beat the Colts at INDY, whats ur excuse for that?It wasn't just Harrison. Ugoh's replacement in that game played horribly. Every time they got a break to Manning, including the last fumble it was by going right through Charlie Johnson. Harrison may have gotten them that 4 extra points and given Wayne and Clark more room to get open on thrird downs but put Ugoh back in too and Cots win that game. The Pats might win the AFC final against the Colts (if both teams make it) but if Moss and Matt Light were out then NE has no chance.NO SHIT, IF THIS AND IF THATif Brady had better WR's then Gaffney and Caldwell (WHO DROPPED A PASS IN THE END ZONE, which made the pats settle for a fg, 4 pt difference, the difference in the game) then Peyton wouldnt even have a title...STOP MAKING EXCUSESI'm not makng excuses. I'm just saying I wouldn't be surprised if a healthy Colts really lay a beating on NE. I can't see them letting up those two big plays again in the next game and with Ugoh, Diem, and Harrison all healthy the offense could put up a lot more points than last time. All depending on the weather of course. But even then the new Addai and Keith speed and power combo looks even better than last years Rhodes/Addai paring. Addai is a lot better this, and Keith can stretch a play like Rhodes.And hate on Caldwell and the rest all you want. Moss dropped a few balls this year too, and if not for about 18 push offs he may have not gotten a lot of TDs (why no one pounded him for all those psh offs is beyond me) Gonzalez dropped as pass in this season's game. I'm not blaming him for the loss. The Pats could have won if they ran the ball a bit more. Take away Dillon's one big run and they only ran for 60 yards all game. The Colts pounded out about 130 yards in that game. If the whole thing was reversed and Indy had to go fown field in the last minute and Manning threw an INT to finish the game no one would shut up about Manning "choking again". Both teams played sloppy all game. The team who played more sloppy at the end lost.did caldwell not drop a 2nd half td that they had to therefore settle for a fg, yes or no?
Quote from: Hack Wilson on January 01, 2008, 01:28:16 PMQuote from: "THE" MoSav on January 01, 2008, 01:25:51 PMQuote from: Hack Wilson on January 01, 2008, 01:25:07 PMQuote from: "THE" MoSav on January 01, 2008, 01:21:53 PMQuote from: Hack Wilson on January 01, 2008, 12:59:54 PMQuote from: So Glorious on December 30, 2007, 09:57:09 AMOur schedule wasn't as weak as you think. 16 and 0 baby.LOL 2 games vs the worst team in NFL history, played the bills without marshawn lynch, the skins without sean taylor (PLUS 2 starters on hte skins defense went down in the 1st drive vs the pats), the eagles without Mcnabb, the Giants without Shockey, the Colts without Harrisonvery easy schedule compared to the Colts having to play those solid AFC south teams twice eachwho cares...the Pats beat the Colts at INDY, whats ur excuse for that?marvin harrison, already used it. i give them credit for winning every game, but unless they go 19-0 it doesn't matter.and what about at Dallas?dallas is just an over-rated immature team thats not making the superbowl this yearmaybe thats the case, but they still smacked people all year...
Fuck no.........cameras been gone since like week 3 or sume sht.....Remember what happend when the patriots and chargerss played earlier....loland wheres shawn merriman all year.....talken bought cheaten....dat fool juiced lol....and aint done sht since hes benn off lol..no lights out dance all year...lol come on get real....
U can make all the excuses u want about Dallas not being dominating but when u win 13 games in the NFL which is EXTREMLY DIFFICULT to do thats domination, maybe they didnt kill everyone, and played some bad games, but they almost always found a way to get it done, thats a great football team right there...