It's May 21, 2024, 10:59:18 AM
lmao this genius just compared the 96 bulls to the Laker team with Gasol as the 2nd fiddle that got swept by Dallas....smfh. it would take some1 like cham to not laugh at u for that.rodman, the 3rd best player on the bulls, was better than gasol, ya braindead muthafucka. the role players on chicago shitted on ours, as well. toni kukoc and steve kerr, knock down shooters, which we never had. how do u have the nerve to say such retarded shit and not feel like a complete dumbass..seriously. u makin the laker haters proud, and thats about it, mdoggydogg.
Quote from: NIKCC on June 09, 2013, 09:22:47 AMlmao this genius just compared the 96 bulls to the Laker team with Gasol as the 2nd fiddle that got swept by Dallas....smfh. it would take some1 like cham to not laugh at u for that.rodman, the 3rd best player on the bulls, was better than gasol, ya braindead muthafucka. the role players on chicago shitted on ours, as well. toni kukoc and steve kerr, knock down shooters, which we never had. how do u have the nerve to say such retarded shit and not feel like a complete dumbass..seriously. u makin the laker haters proud, and thats about it, mdoggydogg.That is the team that beat the Celtics and their big 3. And this argument did two things, prove my point of Jordan> Bryant and still had a pro Lakers as a team argument. Also, why bury the rest of the team. That's a lame thing to do. Don't you get TEAM! You are on one mans Jock so much you lose the idea that it's a team sport.
That Celtic starting lineup never lost a series except for that series. The previous year they were too injured. Also, in 2010, as I said, 5 players in double digits, that all around great basketball. Now if Kobe won a title with Smush Parker and Kwame Brown, then you'd have an argument. But really, you don't.
Quote from: M Dogg™ on June 09, 2013, 06:48:17 PMThat Celtic starting lineup never lost a series except for that series. The previous year they were too injured. Also, in 2010, as I said, 5 players in double digits, that all around great basketball. Now if Kobe won a title with Smush Parker and Kwame Brown, then you'd have an argument. But really, you don't.YOURE A FUCKIN IDIOT, SHOOT URSELF IN THE FACE
i'd give mad props to Kobe if he won a title with Smush Parker...but he wasn't good enough to pull that off.back to the Heat...they always lose game 1 in the finals and go on to win the series
Quote from: NIKCC on June 10, 2013, 02:37:22 PMQuote from: M Dogg™ on June 09, 2013, 06:48:17 PMThat Celtic starting lineup never lost a series except for that series. The previous year they were too injured. Also, in 2010, as I said, 5 players in double digits, that all around great basketball. Now if Kobe won a title with Smush Parker and Kwame Brown, then you'd have an argument. But really, you don't.YOURE A FUCKIN IDIOT, SHOOT URSELF IN THE FACEI was just quoting Doc Rivers.http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100623091654AA6Tjw6http://www.sportingnews.com/nba/story/2010-08-23/doc-rivers-lakers-starting-five-has-never-beaten-celtics-starting-fiveMan, I don't know what's easier, schooling you in this debate, or eating the Jolly Rancher in my mouth right now.
Quote from: M Dogg™ on June 10, 2013, 02:39:43 PMQuote from: NIKCC on June 10, 2013, 02:37:22 PMQuote from: M Dogg™ on June 09, 2013, 06:48:17 PMThat Celtic starting lineup never lost a series except for that series. The previous year they were too injured. Also, in 2010, as I said, 5 players in double digits, that all around great basketball. Now if Kobe won a title with Smush Parker and Kwame Brown, then you'd have an argument. But really, you don't.YOURE A FUCKIN IDIOT, SHOOT URSELF IN THE FACEI was just quoting Doc Rivers.http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100623091654AA6Tjw6http://www.sportingnews.com/nba/story/2010-08-23/doc-rivers-lakers-starting-five-has-never-beaten-celtics-starting-fiveMan, I don't know what's easier, schooling you in this debate, or eating the Jolly Rancher in my mouth right now.THAT SOUNDED HELLA GAY LMFAOBUT FOREAL, U ARE ONE DUMB PIECE OF SHIT, MDOGG. IF U CANT REALIZE THAT THE '09-'10 LAKERS ARE NOT ON THE SAME LEVEL AS THE '96 BULLS, THEN I HAVE NOTHING ELSE TO DISCUSS WIT UR RETARDED MIND.THEN AGAIN, MDOGG, UR THE SAME IDIOT WHO THOUGHT BOB MCADOO AVERAGED 25 POINTS ON THE LAKERS BECAUSE U CHECKED BASKETBALL REFERENCE AND TRIED TO PASS HIM OFF AS THE GREATEST POWER FORWARD IN OUR HISTORY BASED OFF OF THAT. I WONDER IF U HAVE SOME FORM OF LEARNING DISABILITY? U TALK OUT UR ASS MORE THAN ANYONE IN THE HISTORY OF THE FORUM. I DONT MEAN MAKING BOLD CLAIMS...I MEAN SAYING SHIT WITHOUT HAVING A CLUE AS TO WHAT THE FUCK UR TALKING ABOUT. U JUST TALK TO HEAR URSELF SPEAK SO THAT U CAN FEEL EDUCATED AND UP-TO-PAR WITH THE OTHER POSTERS WHO ACTUALLY KNOW WHAT THE FUCK THEY'RE SAYING.. SOMETIMES I JUST WANNA SLAP THE DUMBNESS OUT U.LMAO '09 LAKERS MINUS KOBE ARE AS GOOD AS '96 BULLS MINUS JORDAN....ROFLMFAO. I WISH I COULD PISS ON U RIGHT NOW
where were Pippen's titles without Jordan?
I had respect from you?
..and will forever taint LeBron's legacy. seriously, they're hands down the favorites and should have a cake-walk the rest of the way with how their all-staresque roster is clicking. everyone's already penciled them in as the winners, with less doubt than any team has ever faced. if they win, it's already expected, not one person out there will be able to say "we didnt see this coming"..but if they lose, the consequences will be much more bitter than the joy of winning would be sweet. barring injury, it will go down as the biggest disappointment in NBA history and LeBron will have lost with EASILY the best supporting cast in the league.....and to be honest, I can see either Indiana or Memphis givin Miami a tough time. should be interesting the rest of the way.......