It's May 14, 2024, 08:25:07 PM
Quote from: 7even on November 07, 2008, 03:57:40 PMThat nigga also said T-Mac > LeBron.u know which thread that was in?
That nigga also said T-Mac > LeBron.
As a Laker fan i wouldn't trade Bynum for Amare at the moment.That's not absurd at all.What's the problem tho'? Laker fans are happy about Bynum.The Lakers have a 4-0 record.We are happy.You are happy (you don't have Bynum in your team).It's all good.
Theres no possible way you guys dont already know that you cant take NIK seriously on any comparisons made between Laker players and any other players. His judgement is so blinded when it comes to this shit. You know when a retarded kid makes one of those loud outburtsts....and even though you hear, you try to pretend like you didnt? Same thing with NIK.
^Yeah, I'm also happy with how Brandon Bass is evolving. Does that mean jack shit? LOL
Quote from: Antonio on November 07, 2008, 02:43:51 PMAs a Laker fan i wouldn't trade Bynum for Amare at the moment.That's not absurd at all.What's the problem tho'? Laker fans are happy about Bynum.The Lakers have a 4-0 record.We are happy.You are happy (you don't have Bynum in your team).It's all good.im sure your happy with him & he truly is a nice fit for your team, hes a good player too...but Amare is head and shoulders better.
of course Laker fans are gonna say Bynum > Amare.
Quote from: Chamillitary Click on November 07, 2008, 04:08:05 PMQuote from: Antonio on November 07, 2008, 02:43:51 PMAs a Laker fan i wouldn't trade Bynum for Amare at the moment.That's not absurd at all.What's the problem tho'? Laker fans are happy about Bynum.The Lakers have a 4-0 record.We are happy.You are happy (you don't have Bynum in your team).It's all good.im sure your happy with him & he truly is a nice fit for your team, hes a good player too...but Amare is head and shoulders better. I don't know, man. If you want to put it this way ok, Amare is playing on a level Bynum still has to reach, so he is "better". Ok. But this is almost the same discussion we had about Steve Nash a couple of years ago, talking about his one-dimensional type of play. If you ask me, i'd rather have Derek Fisher in my team than Steve Nash. That probably doesn't mean Fisher is better than Nash (he clearly isn't), but that means Nash has a major gap in his game that doesn't make him perfect for every situation. Take a player like Kobe Bryant: he's the best player in the League cause he can fit in every team in the League, being the best offensive player in the League AND at the same time an All-Defensive type of defender. He doesn't have major gaps in his game. (i'm not dickriding Kobe. I think it's pretty obvious what i'm saying, but you can say the same things about Pierce, KG, Lebron, etc.. those type of players are "complete" and dominant for real, even if they swich teams and scenarios). Like i said, Amare imho can't play Center at all, and he's better as a Power Forward playing with a defensive/power Center (like Shaq). That way he can care about the offensive aspect of his game more, and the team can suffer less on defence. But if you put him as a Center playing against a real offensive Center, he really is embarassing. And i mean embarassing. So the comparision itself is wrong, cause they are two different type of players and they could play very well together (maybe they will, in the future, in the U.S.A. team). If you like those type of x >>>>>>>>>>>< y games go ahead. But i still keep Bynum over him, with no esitation. So that means something.
I love how stats don't mean shit till it comes time for you to defend Bynum
Quote from: Antonio on November 07, 2008, 05:35:05 PMQuote from: Chamillitary Click on November 07, 2008, 04:08:05 PMQuote from: Antonio on November 07, 2008, 02:43:51 PMAs a Laker fan i wouldn't trade Bynum for Amare at the moment.That's not absurd at all.What's the problem tho'? Laker fans are happy about Bynum.The Lakers have a 4-0 record.We are happy.You are happy (you don't have Bynum in your team).It's all good.im sure your happy with him & he truly is a nice fit for your team, hes a good player too...but Amare is head and shoulders better. I don't know, man. If you want to put it this way ok, Amare is playing on a level Bynum still has to reach, so he is "better". Ok. But this is almost the same discussion we had about Steve Nash a couple of years ago, talking about his one-dimensional type of play. If you ask me, i'd rather have Derek Fisher in my team than Steve Nash. That probably doesn't mean Fisher is better than Nash (he clearly isn't), but that means Nash has a major gap in his game that doesn't make him perfect for every situation. Take a player like Kobe Bryant: he's the best player in the League cause he can fit in every team in the League, being the best offensive player in the League AND at the same time an All-Defensive type of defender. He doesn't have major gaps in his game. (i'm not dickriding Kobe. I think it's pretty obvious what i'm saying, but you can say the same things about Pierce, KG, Lebron, etc.. those type of players are "complete" and dominant for real, even if they swich teams and scenarios). Like i said, Amare imho can't play Center at all, and he's better as a Power Forward playing with a defensive/power Center (like Shaq). That way he can care about the offensive aspect of his game more, and the team can suffer less on defence. But if you put him as a Center playing against a real offensive Center, he really is embarassing. And i mean embarassing. So the comparision itself is wrong, cause they are two different type of players and they could play very well together (maybe they will, in the future, in the U.S.A. team). If you like those type of x >>>>>>>>>>>< y games go ahead. But i still keep Bynum over him, with no esitation. So that means something.i feel what your sayin, but thats just how it is. some people just fit in better. like i think Iverson is just better than Billups (hands down). but i think Billups was a better fit for Detroit, therefore the trade was bad on the Pistons part...but Iverson is still the better player.the Lakers have the most talent in the league, so you dont need more offense & Bynum might be the better fit. but to a regular/below average team (Knicks, Nets, couple other East teams ) & they had to take Bynum or Amare, there takin Amare all day everyday.