It's May 21, 2024, 06:37:33 AM
^you didnt sound like this when Lakers had a negative seasonhypocrite.
Quote from: MoSavThanLegit on December 07, 2006, 04:29:08 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on December 07, 2006, 04:17:38 PMQuote from: MoSavThanLegit on December 07, 2006, 04:16:55 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on December 06, 2006, 11:11:29 AMQuote from: Don Jacob on December 06, 2006, 02:50:15 AMthose are mvp numbers...Not when you only play one end of the floor. all the SUNS play like that...That doesnt change how VALUABLE he is to the team...It changes how valuable he is as a player, and it definitely means he can't be the MOST valuable...PeACeI dont think he should have won either, But he did..I think the League felt that with Amare out Nash was even more valuable...And when Nash doesnt play the Suns are a WAY different team...yeah i agree, i was shocked when he won the 2nd straight mvp because i honestly thought Kobe had it, though you can make cases for both players. But i also believe...Suns without Nash = Lakers without Kobe, both are very valuable to their teams.
Quote from: Now_I_Know on December 07, 2006, 04:17:38 PMQuote from: MoSavThanLegit on December 07, 2006, 04:16:55 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on December 06, 2006, 11:11:29 AMQuote from: Don Jacob on December 06, 2006, 02:50:15 AMthose are mvp numbers...Not when you only play one end of the floor. all the SUNS play like that...That doesnt change how VALUABLE he is to the team...It changes how valuable he is as a player, and it definitely means he can't be the MOST valuable...PeACeI dont think he should have won either, But he did..I think the League felt that with Amare out Nash was even more valuable...And when Nash doesnt play the Suns are a WAY different team...
Quote from: MoSavThanLegit on December 07, 2006, 04:16:55 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on December 06, 2006, 11:11:29 AMQuote from: Don Jacob on December 06, 2006, 02:50:15 AMthose are mvp numbers...Not when you only play one end of the floor. all the SUNS play like that...That doesnt change how VALUABLE he is to the team...It changes how valuable he is as a player, and it definitely means he can't be the MOST valuable...PeACe
Quote from: Now_I_Know on December 06, 2006, 11:11:29 AMQuote from: Don Jacob on December 06, 2006, 02:50:15 AMthose are mvp numbers...Not when you only play one end of the floor. all the SUNS play like that...That doesnt change how VALUABLE he is to the team...
Quote from: Don Jacob on December 06, 2006, 02:50:15 AMthose are mvp numbers...Not when you only play one end of the floor.
those are mvp numbers...
Kobe is a better basketball player than Nash but SN is more valuable to his team, no doubt.
if youd simply give it to the best player it would be boring. it would be the same players over and over... according to you laker fans kobe wouldve gotten the trophy like 6 times already with another 6 coming, yes, that would be a great thing.
Quote from: 7even on December 09, 2006, 03:24:11 AMif youd simply give it to the best player it would be boring. it would be the same players over and over... according to you laker fans kobe wouldve gotten the trophy like 6 times already with another 6 coming, yes, that would be a great thing.Man the only real MVP Trophy who shouldn't be revoked is the NBA Finals one. Cause it means you're giving credits to the player most valuable for the team who won the NBA. But what's the point giving a MVP Trophy for the Regular season? I mean even Paul is fundamental for the Hornets. Why Nash and not Paul?
Quote from: Antonio on December 09, 2006, 04:46:41 AMQuote from: 7even on December 09, 2006, 03:24:11 AMif youd simply give it to the best player it would be boring. it would be the same players over and over... according to you laker fans kobe wouldve gotten the trophy like 6 times already with another 6 coming, yes, that would be a great thing.Man the only real MVP Trophy who shouldn't be revoked is the NBA Finals one. Cause it means you're giving credits to the player most valuable for the team who won the NBA. But what's the point giving a MVP Trophy for the Regular season? I mean even Paul is fundamental for the Hornets. Why Nash and not Paul?cmon man whats wrong with you? Nash has more PPG and assists than Paul, plus, his team is going to win about 20 more games. Are you serious dude?
^ Yes, people act as if they don't know what "valuable" means.The Lakers did hella good this year in the games without Kobe. Didnt they win like all of them?Now look at the Suns before Nash came. Nobody is argueing that Kobe is the better player, but Nash makes a huge difference for his team.