It's May 11, 2024, 04:46:04 AM
Total Members Voted: 27
That being said, Lakers are not anywhere near to being the team they were with the great Shaquille O'Neal.
2..........0And Laker fans (was one myself) are still in denial about their team.Shoulda never let the big man go...!!
Quote from: Now_I_Know on April 24, 2007, 10:20:33 PMWe can still do it...Time for the Suns to sleep. Lets take care of these next 2 at home. Remember, I said we'll win 2 out of the next 3 after game 1...Anyone think that's impossible? Cuz I don't.Do what? it's gonna take a fucking miracle for the Lakers to win the series...this entire team needs to be overhauled in the summer...
We can still do it...Time for the Suns to sleep. Lets take care of these next 2 at home. Remember, I said we'll win 2 out of the next 3 after game 1...Anyone think that's impossible? Cuz I don't.
/\Living in the past? How long has Kobe had to organize the game plan with the Lakers?Yeah, Shaq is old...however look at both team's records? What were their standings last when the seasons ended? How far did each team get?You muthafuckers still fail to see that the only thing Kobe is good for is building HIMSELF as a player. He has absolutely NOTHING to contribute to the Lakers.
Let's forget and focus on Game 3... anything can happen , nobody thought the Suns were gonna come back from a 3-1 deficit so you never know.. even if it's very frustrating (woke up at 4.30 am to watch this game ..). It's obvious we're not at the same level we were last year, both as team and indivuals players, when the Suns have added Amare in the middle.. if we go on playing like this, we'll be swept but I know some players gonna react and defend Lakers pride.. plus it's an usual thing in the playoffs, when a team is down 2-0 and has been destroyed in the 2nd game, game 3 is often won by this team..
Let's not forget the conference semifinals in 2004. Lakers were down 2-0 and won the next 4 games versus San Antonio. Admittedly the Lakers aren't as good as they were 3 years ago, but the Suns aren't as good as the Spurs either.
Quote from: eS El Duque on April 19, 2007, 07:17:34 AMlmao...peace out lakersWanna bet your account on that?
lmao...peace out lakers
And Laker fans (was one myself)
Quote from: BiG*WiCkEd on April 25, 2007, 11:39:41 AM/\Living in the past? How long has Kobe had to organize the game plan with the Lakers?Yeah, Shaq is old...however look at both team's records? What were their standings last when the seasons ended? How far did each team get?You muthafuckers still fail to see that the only thing Kobe is good for is building HIMSELF as a player. He has absolutely NOTHING to contribute to the Lakers.Shaq is old, the Lakers in the early 2000's, had a better supporting cast, and Kobe had yet to come into his own yet. Now it's Kobe's time, it's just a matter of getting a team around him. You are living in the past dogg, the Lakers had to move forward, and they did. They are building, and trading Shaq made them better this year than if they kept Shaq, bottom line.
a weak arguement to cover Kobe's weakness as a contributer to the Lakers.